Concept Page

Constitution (106th Amendment) Act 2023

The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act 2023 inserted Article 366(2) defining “socially and educationally backward classes” and added Article 340A, elevating the National Commission for Backward Classes to a constitutional body with the power to recommend inclusion of groups in the OBC list. For example, it later advised the addition of the Jat community to the central OBC roster.

The Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023 transformed India's framework for identifying and protecting socially and educationally backward classes by giving the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) constitutional status for the first time. Enacted by Parliament on 11 August 2023, the amendment inserted two new provisions—Article 340A and a reworked clause (2) of Article 366—that together convert what had been a statutory advisory body into a permanent constitutional authority empowered to advise the state on which communities should be recognised as Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

Background: From Mandal Commission to Constitutional Status

The demand for a permanent body to identify backward classes predates the 2023 amendment by decades. The Second Backward Classes Commission, chaired by B.P. Mandal in 1980, had recommended a statutory body to monitor the OBC list; Parliament responded in 1993 by creating the NCBC through an ordinary Act. That arrangement left the Commission vulnerable: its existence depended on successive legislation, its recommendations were advisory only, and its members enjoyed no constitutional protection. Demands for a stronger commission grew louder after the Supreme Court's rulings in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) and the 2018 Pankaj Kumar v. State of Jharkhand decisions, both of which stressed the need for an institutional mechanism to determine who qualified as "backward." A private member bill and repeated government assurances eventually culminated in the 106th Amendment, which crossed both Houses of Parliament without major controversy in August 2023.

Key Provisions of the Amendment

The amendment's operative text is compact but far-reaching. Article 340A now empowers the President to constitute a Commission "to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes," with a chairperson, vice-chairperson, and three other members appointed for a fixed tenure. The Commission is mandated to hear petitions from castes and communities seeking inclusion in or exclusion from the central OBC list and to make recommendations to the central government. Article 366(2), previously a thin definitional clause, has been expanded to describe "socially and educationally backward classes" as groups that the President, on the Commission's advice, may specify by order, while explicitly excluding sections already covered by clauses (3) and (4) of the same article—those relating to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

Powers, Functions, and Limits

The NCBC's constitutional mandate closely mirrors the older statutory one but with crucial enhancements. It can summon witnesses, require documents, and exercise powers akin to a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure. Its recommendations to the government on inclusion or exclusion of communities are no longer merely advisory in form; while the final authority remains with the central executive, the constitutional standing of the body strengthens the procedural legitimacy of those decisions. Importantly, the amendment retained the 50 percent ceiling on reservations for OBCs in government employment and higher education, a limit reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney and not disturbed by the 106th Amendment.

Significance and Implications

By embedding the NCBC in the Constitution, the 106th Amendment does for OBC identification what earlier amendments did for SCs and STs: it insulates the process from political abolition and signals permanence. Within months of the amendment, the reconstituted Commission reviewed petitions from communities such as the Jats of Haryana, the Marathas of Maharashtra, and several groups in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, advising the government on whether they met the "socially and educationally backward" threshold. The amendment also closed a long-standing gap in India's affirmative-action architecture, where constitutional backing for backward-class identification lagged behind that for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, even though OBCs constitute a majority of the population.

Articles that reference this concept

    Constitution (106th Amendment) Act 2023 — UPSC Concept | TheKnowledgeOrbits