GS3Indian Economy·19 May 2026·3 min read

Chandigarh Lawyers Challenge Extension of Assam Tenancy Act 2021

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association has moved the court against the Centre's notification extending the Assam Tenancy Act 2021 to Chandigarh. This development highlights the ongoing debates and legal challenges surrounding land reforms and tenancy laws in India, particularly in union territories. The case is likely to be taken up by the appropriate Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on either Tuesday or Wednesday.

Chandigarh Lawyers Challenge Extension of Assam Tenancy Act 2021
  • The Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh, and the District Bar Association, District Courts, Chandigarh, have jointly moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the Centre’s May 6, 2026 notification extending the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 to the Union Territory of Chandigarh.
  • This move comes as a response to the Centre's decision to invoke Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, which empowers it to extend to Chandigarh any law in force in Punjab.
  • The petitioners have challenged the notification on the ground that it not only extends the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021, to Chandigarh but also repeals the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which had been applicable to Chandigarh since November 4, 1972.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh, and the District Bar Association, District Courts, Chandigarh, have jointly moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the Centre’s May 6, 2026 notification extending the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 to the Union Territory of Chandigarh. This move comes as a response to the Centre's decision to invoke Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, which empowers it to extend to Chandigarh any law in force in Punjab. The petitioners have challenged the notification on the ground that it not only extends the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021, to Chandigarh but also repeals the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which had been applicable to Chandigarh since November 4, 1972.

The Assam Tenancy Act, 2021, aims to regulate the relationship between landlords and tenants in Assam, providing a framework for rent fixation, eviction, and other related matters. However, the petitioners contend that the provision does not confer powers upon the Centre to repeal, amend or enact laws in conflict with an existing law applicable to the Union Territory. The petitioners relied upon the Constitution Bench judgment in Constitution of India and Delhi Laws Act (1912), reported as 1951 AIR Supreme Court 332, and the judgment in Ramesh Birich and Others v Union of India and Others, 1989 RCR (Rent) 79, pertaining to Chandigarh’s Rent Act, to argue that the impugned notification is unconstitutional.

  • The Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 designates the Tehsildar as the Rent Authority under Section 30.
  • The Additional Deputy Commissioner has been appointed as the Appellate Authority/Rent Court under Section 33.
  • Civil Procedure has been vested under Section 31.

Significance and What Changes Now

The extension of the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 to Chandigarh has significant implications for the tenants and landlords in the Union Territory. The petitioners pointed out that under the Assam Tenancy Act, the definitions and exemptions, including those relating to industrial premises, hotels, lodgings, inns and dharamshalas, do not correspond with Chandigarh’s local development laws, where building use is defined differently and is not merely user-based.

Did You Know? The Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 does not take into account Chandigarh’s existing legal and developmental framework, which may lead to conflicts and inconsistencies in the implementation of the Act.

The alleged non-consideration of objections is another ground raised in the petition. The petitioners stated that after objections were invited under the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Bar had submitted written objections, but the impugned notification was issued on May 6, 2026, “without hearing or addressing even a single objection”. The petitioners further submitted that the legislation reflected “total non-application of mind” and failed to provide adequate protection to tenants.

Conclusion

The extension of the Assam Tenancy Act, 2021 to Chandigarh has sparked a legal challenge, with the petitioners arguing that the notification is unconstitutional and does not take into account the local development laws and existing legal framework of the Union Territory. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the tenants and landlords in Chandigarh, and will likely set a precedent for the extension of laws to Union Territories in the future.

Concepts Mentioned

Civil Procedure

Civil procedure is the set of rules and guidelines that govern the process of resolving civil disputes in a court of law. It ensures that the legal system operates fairly and efficiently, providing a framework for parties to present their cases and for judges to make informed decisions. For instance, the discovery process in the United States allows parties to request and share evidence with each other.

Full

Ramesh Birich and Others v Union of India and Others

Ramesh Birich and Others v Union of India and Others is a landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of forest rights and the Forest Rights Act of 2006. The case is significant as it upheld the constitutional validity of the Act, recognizing the rights of forest-dwelling communities. It also led to the recognition of 1.5 million forest rights claims across India.

Full

Constitution of India and Delhi Laws Act (1912)

The Constitution of India and Delhi Laws Act of 1912 is a legislation that governed the administration of justice in the Delhi province of British India. It was significant as it laid the foundation for the eventual adoption of the Indian Constitution in 1950. The Act established the Delhi High Court, which remains a key judicial institution in the country.

Full

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act is a law regulating urban rents. It was enacted in 1949 to control rents and prevent eviction of tenants. The act applies to certain cities in Punjab.

Full

Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966

Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, pertains to the apportionment of assets and liabilities between Punjab and Haryana. It is significant for state division. Chandigarh was made a union territory under this act.

Stub

Assam Tenancy Act, 2021

The Assam Tenancy Act, 2021, regulates land ownership and tenancy rights. It aims to protect tenant farmers' interests. The act prohibits land fragmentation below 21.38 acres.

Full

Log in to like, comment, and join the discussion.